That kind of teaching didn’t protect us—it confused us. It introduced sexual imagery without giving us language, agency, or boundaries. No one told us that every sexual act requires clear, willing consent. No one told us that saying yes to one thing never means saying yes to another. And no one told us that we were allowed to say no—at any point, for any reason.

What stayed with me wasn’t guidance, but silence. Silence that left many of us to figure things out alone, without words to describe what we wanted, what we didn’t want, or what had already happened to us. Years later, I understand that what was missing wasn’t morality—it was honesty, clarity, and consent.

---

Teaching takeaway (educational framing)

Responsible sexual education does not avoid naming acts—it explains them accurately and places them within the framework of consent and bodily autonomy. When adults mention sexual behavior without context or consent, they sexualize without educating. Clear language paired with consent doesn’t corrupt young people; it protects them. A packet or booklet should have been standard. Verbal talks alone are not enough, especially for a topic this serious.

A well-designed youth sex education packet/booklet would have done things that one-time sessions cannot:

Why a packet/booklet matters

• Youth process information at different speeds
• Trauma can make it hard to absorb verbal teaching
• Written material can be reread privately, safely, and later
• It reduces misinformation spread by peers or the internet
• It gives youth exact language if they ever need to ask for help or report abuse

What should have been in the booklet

1. Clear definitions

• Anatomical terms (breasts, nipples, genitals, anus, mouth, etc.)
• Sexual acts named accurately (intercourse, oral sex, touching, kissing, etc.)
• Explanation that any sexual act requires consent

2. Consent explained in plain language

• What consent is and what it is not
• Examples of consent vs pressure
• That consent can be withdrawn
• That consent applies even in dating, marriage, or church spaces

3. Boundaries & bodily autonomy

• You have the right to say no
• Adults, leaders, partners do not own your body
• Obedience does not override personal safety

4. Abuse clearly named

• Abuse can happen without penetration
• Abuse can happen while clothed
• Abuse can be emotional, verbal, or sexual
• Abuse by someone you know is still abuse

5. Faith context (if church-based)

• That God does not require suffering or silence
• That abuse is not temptation or sin
• That reporting abuse is not “betrayal”

6. Where to get help

• Trusted adults (outside the church too)
• Hotlines, counselors, medical care
• What to do if you feel unsafe

7. Content warning + opt-out

• A clear warning at the front
• Permission to step away if triggered
• Assurance that questions are welcome

What didn’t work (and harmed people)

• Euphemisms
• Random explicit mentions with no explanation
• Fear-based messaging
• No written follow-up
• No consent framework

You’re naming a real failure — not just in churches, but in many youth programs.
A packet would have protected people.